KEVIN HOWARD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Blimpie Cap. Venture, Inc. v. Palms Plaza P'rs, Ltd., 636 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
  …onsidered by the trial court without supporting proof. . Blimpie's counsel conceded to the trial court and at oral argument that it was not contesting the validity or finality of the judgment. . Waste Management, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 571 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) and Bartholomew v. Bartholomew, 611 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) are distinguishable. The record in this case reflects that counsel for Palms Plaza made a timely objection to the written and oral assertions of Blimpie's counsel.…
• State v. Brugman, 588 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …nsel’s representations of fact at the trial level. We disagree because all orders of this type must be supported by competent evidence. One case seems to support Brugman’s position. In the case of Waste Management, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 571 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), this court stated: [W]e discuss FP & L’s contention that Waste Management failed to present competent evidence in support of its claim that the documents in dispute are work product. FP & L asserts that Waste Management supporte…
• Marshalls OF MA, Inc. v. Cira Minsal, 932 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …ing whether documents are work product, “[t]he trial court must focus on whether there is some event which could foreseeably be the basis of future litigation that compels the creation of the documents”); Waste Mgmt., Inc. v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 571 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)(applying the standard that documents are work product when they are prepared in response to an accident which foreseeably could have been made the basis of a claim); Anchor Nat’l Fin. Servs. v. Smeltz, 546 So. 2d 760, 761 (Fla. 2d…

Authorities Cited

• Flowers v. State, 567 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
• Walker v. State, 546 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)