FLORIDA PERFECTIONS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
J & D FINANCIAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
A summary judgment was rendered in appellee/plaintiff’s favor on certain counts of a complaint. This appeal followed. Counsel for the appellee having admitted before this court that the remaining counts of the complaint against appellant, Florida Perfections, Inc., have been abandoned, the summary judgment is affirmed. See and compare Pacific Mills v. Hillman Garment, 87 So. 2d 599 (Fla.1956); Goldberger v. Regency Highland Condominium Association, Inc., 452 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc., 432 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Spurrier v. United Bank, 359 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Sottile v. Gaines Construction Company, 281 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Accurate Metal Finishing Corp. v. Carmel, 254 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
Flowers v. State, 586 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1991)…lating legal constraint points. The district courts have differed in the interpretation of these rules. Compare Walker v. State, 546 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (legal constraint points should be assessed for each conviction) and Carter v. State, 571 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (same) with Lewis v. State, 574 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (legal constraint points are assessed only once). The conflicting opinions in Walker, Carter, and Lewis result from competing policies in calculating the sentencing s…
-
Carter v. State, 586 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1991)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Carter v. State, 571 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), which is in direct conflict with Lewis v. State, 574 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), and Scott v. State, 574 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.…
-
Lewis v. State, 574 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…reme court.”). Since Walker, the Fifth District has certified the use of the multiplier to the Florida Supreme Court, Flowers v. State, 567 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), and the Fourth District has ruled in favor of a multiplier, Carter v. State, 571 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We do not agree that the guidelines require the use of a multiplier with legal constraint. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.701,1 and 3.988, do not require the use of a multiplier. Nor do they contain language susceptible…
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Flagship Nat'l Bank OF Miami v. Gray Distrib. Sys., Inc., 432 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Sottile v. Gaines Constr. Co., 281 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- Pacific Mills v. Hillman Garment, Inc., 87 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1956)
- Accurate Metal Finishing Corp. v. Carmel, 254 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Goldberger v. Regency Highland Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 452 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Spurrier v. United Bank, 359 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)