KENNETH BAILEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH BAILEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
572 So. 2d 1032
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Bailey appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. Because this case is factually indistinguishable from Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), we are bound by its holding.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant Bailey’s motion to suppress.
Judgment and sentence VACATED; REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
COWART, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boyd v. State, 587 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 1991)…PER CURIAM. We have for review the consolidated cases of Boyd v. State, 572 So. 2d 1032, 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Doughty v. State, 578 So. 2d 65, 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Howarth v. State, 578 So. 2d 66, 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Natvik v. State, 574 So. 2d 1230, 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), and Zozak v. State, 576 So. 2d 312, 312 (Fla. 5t…
Authorities Cited
- Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (U.S. 1987)