RANDY BOYD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDY BOYD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
572 So. 2d 1032
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the lower court; however, as in Flowers v. State, 567 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boyd v. State, 587 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 1991)…PER CURIAM. We have for review the consolidated cases of Boyd v. State, 572 So. 2d 1032, 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Doughty v. State, 578 So. 2d 65, 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Howarth v. State, 578 So. 2d 66, 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Natvik v. State, 574 So. 2d 1230, 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), and Zozak v. State, 576 So. 2d 312, 312 (Fla. 5t…
Authorities Cited
- Flowers v. State, 567 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)