M. A. MCDOUGALD, AS CHIEF OF POLICE, CITY OF PLANT CITY, FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. REGGIE YATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgmnet to be given in t'he premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court *624that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
On Petition for Rehearing.
In connection with the petition 'for rehearing, in view of the fears expressed in the petition, it may well be observed that in affirming the judgment below, the question of the alleged ineligibility of the municipal judge to hold that office was not considered by this Court, as the Court was of the opinion that, without regard to that question, the action of the court below should for other reasons be affirmed.
Rehearing denied.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
On Petition for Rehearing.
Per Curiam.
In connection with the petition 'for rehearing, in view of the fears expressed in the petition, it may well be observed that in affirming the judgment below, the question of the alleged ineligibility of the municipal judge to hold that office was not considered by this Court, as the Court was of the opinion that, without regard to that question, the action of the court below should for other reasons be affirmed.
Rehearing denied.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Crichlow v. The Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y of the United States, 131 Fla. 752 (Fla. 1938)…. 959, 138 Sou. Rep. 481. On November 2, 1931, a final decree in behalf of plaintiff was made and entered by the lower court and the defend [*754] ants appealed therefrom to this Court when the appeal was dismissed. It was reported in 105 Fla. 640, 142 Sou. Rep. 219. The appeal subsequently was reinstated and affirmed by this Court in 113 Fla. 668, 152 Sou. Rep. 849. The case appeared here on a technical adverse ruling by the lower court and is reported in 117 Fla. 235, 159 Sou. Rep. 46. On July 18, 1936, the…