CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
573 So. 2d 100
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
BARFIELD, Judge.
The trial court’s order denying the petition for writ of mandamus on the ground that “[t]he Florida Parole and Probation Commission has the ultimate discretion in deciding whether to parole” is REVERSED. Florida Parole Commission v. Padovano, 554 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), rev. den., 564 So. 2d 488 (Fla.1990). The case is REMANDED to the trial court for a ruling on the merits of the petition.
JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
HERTZ Rent-A-Car & Hertz Claim Mgmt. v. Sosa, 670 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…PER CURIAM. The claimant moves for rehearing, relying upon cases such as Musgrove v. Children’s Home Society, 573 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), wherein we held that the judge of compensation claims erred in failing to set aside a lump sum settlement which included a statutorily prohibited settlement of Mus-grove’s right to future medical care. But the claimant herein is…
-
Brevard Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs & Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc. v. Williams, 715 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…neously set aside the entire settlement agreement. We agree. Under the law in effect at the time of the settlement, a settlement of future medical expenses was prohibited. [*1102] § 440.20(12), Fla. Stat. (1989); Musgrove v. Children’s Home Society, 573 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Future medical benefits for non-psychiatric problems are permitted in the instant agreement, see Maggard v. Montverde Academy, 505 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), however, in the agreement the claimant waived his right to claim…
-
Spotmaster Cleaners & Zurich-American Ins. Cos. v. Special Disability Tr. Fund, 580 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…the employer. This issue will have to be dealt with on remand. . See Tower Chemical Co. v. Hubbard, 527 So. 2d 886, 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Great Bay Distributors v. Everett, 513 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Musgrove v. Children’s Home Society, 573 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). , For example, if the potential value of medical benefits was $3.00 and the potential value of wage-loss benefits was $2.00, the settlement could be allocated on a 3:2 basis between these two categories.…
Authorities Cited
- Standley v. State, 554 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)