MICHAEL STREBEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the officers exceeded their authority under Terry v. Ohio by persisting with a patdown after any suspicion of being armed should have been dispelled.
[1] A police officer's authority to detain individuals suspected of involvement with a stolen vehicle does not automatically extend to a patdown for weapons if there is no re…
[2] A police officer exceeds the scope of a lawful Terry stop and frisk when, after a patdown has failed to reveal any weapons, the officer persists in questioning the detain…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePolice stopped three individuals, including Strebel, who matched the description of suspects involved with an abandoned stolen car. After a patdown, a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frisk cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Michael Strebel appeals an order of the circuit court placing him on probation (adju dication withheld) for the offense of possession of LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide). § 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1989). We reverse.
The sole issue on appeal concerns the stop and subsequent search during which the LSD was discovered. Strebel was one of three individuals detained after a citizen reported the abandonment of an automobile. This apparently turned out to have been a stolen car.1 Strebel and his companions, who matched the description given by the citizen, were stopped some three blocks from where the car had been left. Each of the three detainees was asked to empty his pockets. One officer then conducted a patdown of Strebel’s clothing, discovering “something like a box” inside a jacket pocket. He asked Strebel what he had inside his pocket; Stre-bel first said “nothing,” then indicated it was “a box of matches.” Strebel produced the box, which was partially open. Inside was the LSD, which the officer recognized from “hav[ing] seen it in training school.”
Although Strebel argues otherwise, we cannot say that the police acted improperly in detaining the three individuals. However, it is less clear .from the record whether any of the officers had a reasonable basis for concluding that Strebel might have been armed. Certainly, any-such suspicion should have been dispelled after the patdown. By persisting, the officers exceeded their authority under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and related cases. See, e.g., Walker v. State, 514 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Thus we must agree that the trial court erred in denying Strebel’s motion to suppress the LSD.
Reversed.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur. . Though Strebel and his companions initially were suspected of having stolen and/or burglarized this automobile, the record before us does not indicate that sufficient evidence existed to have arrested any of them on such charges, or that any arrests were made apart from Strebel’s drug charge.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Emelio Hamilton v. State, 597 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…ly may conduct a “patdown” of the suspect’s outer clothing if they reasonably believe the suspect may be armed. Reynolds v. State, 592 So. 2d 1082 (Fla.1992). Absent such belief, the suspect’s person may not be searched. See, e.g., Strebel v. State, 573 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Thus, even if the deputies were correct in suspecting that Hamilton may have been engaged in a drug transaction, they admitted to no specific, articulable facts which would justify the weapons pat-down. Since the contraband was…
Authorities Cited
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968)
- Walker v. State, 514 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)