LARRY THOMAS MCCLAIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1991-01-29
No. 89-3239
BOOTH, WENTWORTH and MINER, JJ., concur.
573 So. 2d 210 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Harmon v. State, 527 So. 2d 182 (Fla.1988) (“for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as the legal ground for the objection below”); Johnson v. State, 438 So. 2d 774 (Fla.1983).

BOOTH, WENTWORTH and MINER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Boudreaux v. Dugger, 579 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …which, if true, might establish that the Department of Corrections has failed to comply with due process requirements. Therefore, summary dismissal of his petition without even the holding of an evidentiary hearing was error. See Williams v. Dugger, 573 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Eahming v. Bigham, 539 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); and Bagley v. Brierton, 362 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. ERVIN, J., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw