ERNEST COLEMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ERNEST COLEMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
105 Fla. 625
Florida Supreme Court (1932)
Caution
Also reported at: 142 So. 232
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Richter Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199 (Fla. 1935)…without first offering to return to the defendant corporation'the money actually received from the corporation on the loan less the usurious payments made, provided it be found that there was any usury. Appellant cites the case of Robbins v. Blanc, 105 Fla. 625, 142 So. 223, but that case does not, in the writer’s opniion, support the appellant’s contention. On the other hand, it supports the contention of the appellee. In that case Mr. Justice Davis, speaking for the Court, had this to say: ■ “To support…
-
Gen. Cap. Corp. v. TEL Serv. Co., Inc., 212 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…. Sturm, Fla.1953, 65 So. 2d 864; Mears v. Mayblum, Fla.157, 96 So. 2d 223; Gilbert v. Doris R. Corp., Fla.App.1959, 111 So. 2d 682; Lee Construction Corp. v. Newman, Fla.App.1962, 143 So. 2d 222; Griffin v. Kelly, supra; and Robbins v. Blanc, 1932, 105 Fla. 625, 142 So. 223. The defense of laches is only available where the lapse of time has not alone been unreasonable, but it has also operated to the disadvantage or prejudice of the other party. Reed v. Fain, Fla.1961, 145 So. 2d 858; State ex rel. Clend…
-
Leon F. Adkinson and wife Eveline D. Adkinson v. Anne Nyberg, 344 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)…er of the full balance to become due under the agreement for deed. See Wordinger v. Wirt, 112 Fla. 822, 151 So. 47 (1933). Of course, the vendees’ right to redeem would be protected just as in a traditional foreclosure of mortgage. Robbins v. Blanc, 105 Fla. 625, 142 So. 223 (1932). The partial summary judgment awarded plaintiff is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. On remand the plaintiff should be allowed to amend her pleading to claim any sums then du…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence