ANGELO WILLIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1991-02-01
No. 90-01890
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
573 So. 2d 449 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s sentence imposed pursuant to the habitual felony offender’ statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). The statute, as amended in 1988, see ch. 88-131, § 6, Laws of Fla., no longer, requires the trial court to specifically find that an enhanced sentence is necessary for the protection of the public. See Proctor v. State, 570 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

We strike the imposition of court costs and attorney’s fees without prejudice to the' state to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wyatt v. State, 581 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …PER CURIAM. Appellant’s sentences are affirmed. See Willis v. State, 573 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The imposition of restitution, to which appellant agreed at the change of plea hearing and for which no objection was made at sentencing, is also affirmed. The assessment of court costs and attorney’s fees is striken without prej…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw