HARRY LEE GRANT, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HARRY LEE GRANT, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
573 So. 2d 1055
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
We affirm the appellant’s convictions in all respects. The trial court, however, apparently departed from the guidelines recommended range without stating written or oral reasons. The scoresheet recommendation was five and a half to seven years in prison for the offenses of armed robbery with a deadly weapon and aggravated battery, yet the court sentenced the defendant to nine years.
Accordingly, we remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rewjb Dairy Plant Assocs. v. Bombardier Cap., Inc., 152 So. 3d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…for each of several prefabs, and the parties’ correspondence regarding this issue plainly presents a factual issue for jury consideration. Such a conflict generally is a question for the province of the jury. See Cornette v. Rite Commc’n Sys., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (reversing directed verdict on accord and satisfaction where there was conflicting evidence for the jury to resolve); S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Acme Elec. Contractors, Inc., 418 So. 2d 1187, 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (“Gener…
-
Grant v. State, 600 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…[*20] LEHAN, Judge. Defendant appeals the 10 years probation he received as part of a probationary split sentence upon resentencing after his first appeal in Grant v. State, 573 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). We affirm his probationary split sentence. In the first appeal this court reversed defendant’s sentence because it was an upward departure without written reasons. At resentencing, the trial court imposed the probationary split…