SALTA INVESTMENT, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
ORLANDO G. SILVA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-02-19
No. 90-1687
Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
573 So. 2d 1091 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. McCorquodale v. Keyton, 63 So. 2d 906 (Fla.1953); Easton v. Appler, 548 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Hoff v. Scott, 453 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Langer v. Walton, 93 So. 3d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …ddressed or necessarily considered by the appellate court’s decision.” Juliano, 801 at 106 (citations omitted). Appellants rely on Salta Investment, Inc. v. Silva, 584 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (“Salta II ”) and Salta Investment, Inc. v. Silva, 573 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (“Salta I ”), rev. dismissed, 581 So. 2d 166 (FIa.1991) to support a reversal. In Salta II, the Third District issued a per curiam opinion stating: We reverse the final judgment awarding Orlando G. Silva attorney’s fees and costs…
    1 / 2
  • Salta Inv., Inc. v. Silva, 584 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …fees and costs. Silva had filed a claim for declaratory relief against landowner Salta Investment, Inc. This court affirmed the trial court’s decision ordering Salta to remove a fence along an ingress/egress easement. See Salta Inv., Inc. v. Silva, 573 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review dismissed, 581 So. 2d 166 (Fla.1991). At that time, both parties’ motions for attorney’s fees made to this court were denied. This denial of fees is conclusive as to that issue and controls as to the fees awarded in the in…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw