MIKE SILVER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MIKE SILVER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
573 So. 2d 1092
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The state properly concedes that the trial court erred in imposing an adult sanction upon the defendant, who was a juvenile at the time of the offense, without making the mandatory factual findings as to the suitability of adult sanctions as required by section 39.111(7), Florida Statutes (1987). See State v. Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Green v. State, 506 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Petithomme v. State, 610 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…rmed. As the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing an adult sentence upon a defendant who was a juvenile without making the mandatory factual findings required by section 39.111(7), Florida Statutes (1989). See Silver v. State, 573 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA1991). The trial court’s failure to provide factual findings in support of adult sanctions requires that the defendant’s sentence be vacated and remanded to the trial court for resen-tencing. Kohler v. State, 588 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Learnhart Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1984)
- Gresham v. State, 506 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)