MARK WILLIAM FOLTZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK WILLIAM FOLTZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
574 So. 2d 307
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Pittman v. State, 570 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. State, 693 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…iciency of appellant’s motion under either Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(1996); Barfield v. State, 671 So. 2d 820, 820-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Basnight v. State, 574 So. 2d 307, 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.…
-
Burchfield v. State, 907 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…to allege “1) the court which rendered the judgment and sentence; 2) whether there was an appeal from the judgment or sentence and its disposition; and 3) whether a previous post-conviction motion was filed and, if so, how many”); Basnight v. State, 574 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (affirming denial of rule 3.850 motion on grounds that “the motion was facially insufficient in that it did not state whether a previous post-conviction motion had been filed and, if so, the reason [the current] claim was not rai…
Authorities Cited
- Pittman v. State, 570 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)