LUCIE RAPHAEL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LUCIE RAPHAEL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
574 So. 2d 329
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The state correctly concedes that the trial court erred in excluding the defense witnesses without conducting a Richardson inquiry. Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971); Smith v. State, 372 So. 2d 86 (Fla.1979); S.G. v. State, 518 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Ward v. State, 477 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), approved, 502 So. 2d 1245 (Fla.1987). We therefore reverse the convictions and sentences and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)
- Smith v. State, 372 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1979)
- Eladio Morales v. State, 518 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Sanchez v. Herb Friesner, 477 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Ward v. State, 477 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- State v. Ward, 502 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 1987)