WILLIAM M. BETTS, APPELLANT,

v.

CARMEN P. SAMARDAK, FORMERLY CARMEN P. BETTS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hillcrest Pac. Corp. v. Yamamura, 727 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …to allege sufficient facts to show that it justifiably relied on any representations made by the appellees to its detriment. Without justifiable reliance, there can be no actionable fraud. See Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. High Tech Med. Sys., Inc., 574 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). FDIC involved an action brought by FDIC, as liquidator of a bank, against a debtor’s accounting firm, asserting, among other things, fraudulent misrepresentation. The fraud claim arose from allegations that the accounting firm f…
• Hotels OF KEY Largo, Inc. v. RHI Hotels, Inc., 694 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …atmasian, 593 So. 2d 1077, 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)(“A party may not recover in fraud for an alleged oral misrepresentation which is adequately dealt with in a later written contract.”); Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. High Tech Medical Systems, Inc., 574 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)(reliance on oral representations in light of disclaimer in written contract was not justifiable and thus there can be no actionable fraud). We write further because the issue of the scope of the economic loss doctrine as it relat…
• Taylor Woodrow Homes Fla., Inc. v. 4/46-A Corp., 850 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …alleged oral misrepresentation which is adequately dealt with in a later written contract.”) (citing Saunders Leasing Sys.); Tevini v. Roscioli Yacht Sales, Inc., 597 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. High Tech Med. Sys., 574 So. 2d 1121, 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that there was no justifiable reliance in the face of an express disclaimer contained in the report). In Hillcrest, for example, the court held: Although Pacific alleges that the appel-lees misrepresented the “pri…

Authorities Cited

• Russell v. Russell, 507 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)