IN RE ESTATE OF HULLY B. STIRLING, DECEASED
IN RE ESTATE OF HULLY B. STIRLING, DECEASED
574 So. 2d 1139
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in all respects except for appellant’s claim that he is entitled to prejudgment interest on the award of attorney’s fees. We remand on that issue with directions that the trial court fix the date that appellant last rendered services to appellee and award interest on the fee award from that date. We find that there is competent substantial evidence to support the other rulings of the trial court challenged on appeal.
ANSTEAD, J., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Travelers Ins. Co. v. D.J. Wells, Jr., 633 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…Housing Authority, Inc. v. South Florida Sanitation Co., 478 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 491 So. 2d 280 (Fla.1986); Belly Acres, Inc. v. Frankel, 412 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). See Webb Automotive Distributors, Inc. v. Baxter, 574 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 583 So. 2d 1034 (Fla.1991). . 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 352 (1978); Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Morgan, 338 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). . See T.D.S., Inc. v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co.…
-
Arnold v. Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co., 174 So. 3d 1082 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…plaintiff did not accept remittitur amount did not comply with Rule 1.530(f) because it failed to provide specific reasons for its decision to reduce the award of punitive damages by a specific amount); [*1087] Webb Auto. Distribs., Inc. v. Baxter, 574 So. 2d 1139, 1140-41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (explaining that an order granting remitti-tur but failing to explain the reasons for the amount of the remittitur rendered the order “deficient,” citing Wackenhut and Zambrano). Moreover, an order which “contains an inc…
-
M.J. Stavola Farms, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 742 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)…the time of the taking, to increase production over the next 45 years, or that demand or price would increase. Future speculative damages such as these are not properly considered for valuation purposes. Webb Automotive Distributors, Inc. v. Baxter, 574 So. 2d 1139, 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also U.S. v. 22.80 Acres of Land, 839 F. 2d 1362, 1365 (9th Cir.1988); Foster v. U.S., 2 Cl.Ct. 426 (Cl.Ct.1983). In this case, Dixie Lime’s evidence (the most favorable to Dixie Lime) established that there were suff…