KATHRYN COLLINS AND THE DEPT. OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLES BRODZKI, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed an award of attorney fees against HRS in a paternity suit because the trial court refused to consider evidence suggesting the petitioner had conceded the respondent was not the father, preventing proper evaluation of whether the suit was frivolous.
A trial court's award of attorney fees for a frivolous paternity suit must be reversed when the court refuses to consider material evidence relevant to determining whether the action was brought in bad faith.
[1] Attorney fees may be awarded to a successful respondent in a paternity action under section 57.105, Fla.Stat., if proper predicate is made and the amount is reasonable, b…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“There was evidence available to HRS (and an attempt was made to present it to the trial judge) from the respondent which indicated that the petitioner had conceded that respondent was not the father of the child.”
Describing the evidence the trial court refused to consider in determining frivolousness
HRS and an individual petitioner filed a paternity suit approximately ten years after the events giving rise to the alleged paternity. Evidence existe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Paternity Suit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The trial court found that a paternity suit was frivolous and not brought in good faith, and awarded $5,000.00 in attorney fees against The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS), and the individual petitioner. The events giving rise to the allegation of paternity in this matter occurred some ten years before petition for paternity was instituted. The trial judge was aware of earlier proceedings by the petitioner when she attempted to secure child support. There was evidence available to HRS (and an attempt was made to present it to the trial judge) from the respondent which indicated that the petitioner had conceded that respondent was not the father of the child. The trial court and apparently HRS refused to examine or permit such evidence to be introduced in the record, as both the trial judge and HRS refused to examine it. We therefore reverse the order awarding fees and return the matter to the trial court for consideration of the proper evidence to support its finding of the frivolous and bad faith action. Under the proper circumstances fees may be awarded to a successful respondent in the paternity action pursuant to section 57.105, Fla.Stat. (1989) if the proper predicate is made and the amount is reasonable.1 State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Carr, 501 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Accord Richardson v. Helms, 502 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
. No contention is made that fees awarded in the instance case are not reasonable under the circumstances.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Kern v. Ming P'ship NO. 2, 501 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Donna Richardson & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Helms, 502 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)