SARAH FRANCES SNIPES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Sec. Prof'ls, Inc. v. Segall, 685 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …n, 471 So. 2d 585, 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 484 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1986). As a general rule, parties that are not included in a stipulation for settlement cannot be bound by its provisions. See Video Super Stores of Am., Inc. v. Mastriana, 575 So. 2d 326, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). This general rule does not conflict with the principle that there is an “organic right of parties to contract a settlement, which by definition concludes all claims unless the contract of settlement specifies otherwise.” Un…
• Ahern v. Odyssey RE (London) Ltd., 788 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …overage to her claim. The instant appeal followed. The Refusal to Enforce Ahern’s Consent Judgment Ordinarily, one who is not a party to a settlement agreement cannot be [*372] bound by its terms. See Video Super Stores of Am., Inc. v. Mastriana, 575 So. 2d 326, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Sec. Prof'ls, Inc. ex rel. Paikin v. Segall, 685 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 700 So. 2d 687 (Fla.1997). An exception to this rule applies where, as here, an insurer wrongfully refuses to defend its i…
• Tunison v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 144 So. 3d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
  …Profls, Inc., ex rel. Paikin v. Segall, 685 So. 2d 1381, 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“As a general rule, parties that are not included in a stipulation for settlement cannot be bound by its provisions.”); Video Super Stores of Am., Inc. v. Mastriana, 575 So. 2d 326, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the circuit court’s order to the extent that it denied Mr. Tunison’s request for attorney’s fees. We affirm the circuit court’s order to the extent that it denied Mr. T…

Authorities Cited

• Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)