STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JEAN FAZEKAS, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
JEAN FAZEKAS, APPELLEE
575 So. 2d 327
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The state has filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 924.07(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1987). We treat the state’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition given the state’s failure to show that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law. See generally Wilson v. State, 520 So. 2d 566 (Fla.1988); State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla.1988); Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1983).
Certiorari denied.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Thomas, 599 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…tory appeal, pursuant to section 924.07(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1991), as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny relief because the State failed to show that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law. See State v. Fazekas, 575 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also State v. Smith, 260 So. 2d 489 (Fla.1972). Thomas filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of his motions to dismiss Counts I and IV and Counts V and VI of the information. We likewise treat the cross-a…
Authorities Cited
- Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1983)
- State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1988)
- Wilson v. State, 520 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1988)