J. W. GIBSON, FLORIDA TURPENTINE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, E. E. WEST ESTATE, INC., A CORPORATION, HAMILTON OPERATING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND VICTOR H. DE PASS, APPELLANTS,
v.
B. T. LONGINO, H. R. JACQUAY, M. P. JONES AND HUSBAND, E. Z. JONES, APPELLEES
J. W. GIBSON, FLORIDA TURPENTINE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, E. E. WEST ESTATE, INC., A CORPORATION, HAMILTON OPERATING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND VICTOR H. DE PASS, APPELLANTS,
B. T. LONGINO, H. R. JACQUAY, M. P. JONES AND HUSBAND, E. Z. JONES, APPELLEES
105 Fla. 649
Florida Supreme Court (1932)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 142 So. 216
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whiteield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Theron Black, 385 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 1980)…ncurring specially). The indictment in the case at bar did not even allege that the “grand jurors of Florida in Hernando County” presented that the defendant “in the county and state aforesaid” committed an offense. McElvene v. State, 105 Fla. 639, 142 So. 216 (1932). This is not an appropriate instance to encourage liberal amendment of imprecise allegations as long as the defendant is not prejudiced. Lackos v. State, 339 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1976). The indictment completely failed to allege venue; in this it…
-
Earvin Smith v. State, 211 So. 3d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…. The indictment in the case at bar did not even allege that the “grand jurors of ... [*195] Florida ... in ... Hernando County” presented that the defendant “in the county and state aforesaid” committed an offense. McElvene v. State, 105 Fla. 639, 142 So. 216 (1932). This is not an appropriate instance to encourage liberal amendment of imprecise allegations as long as the defendant is not prejudiced. Lackos v. State, 339 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1976). The indictment completely failed to allege venue; in this it…
-
Sampson v. Louie L. Wainwright, 394 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…d and seventy-eight, in the County and State aforesaid” committed the crime charged. This is sufficient to allege the date, State v. Nixon, 295 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), and place of the commission of the crime, McElvene v. State, 105 Fla. 639, 142 So. 216 (1932); Enson v. State, 58 Fla. 37, 50 So. 948 (1909). The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.…