DOUGLAS WALTER ZOZAK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DOUGLAS WALTER ZOZAK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
576 So. 2d 312
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Other
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO CERTIFY THE QUESTION
We GRANT Appellant’s motion for rehearing and certify to the supreme court the same question raised in Flowers v. State, 567 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boyd v. State, 587 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 1991)…yd v. State, 572 So. 2d 1032, 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Doughty v. State, 578 So. 2d 65, 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Howarth v. State, 578 So. 2d 66, 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), Natvik v. State, 574 So. 2d 1230, 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), and Zozak v. State, 576 So. 2d 312, 312 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the following question of great public importance: DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITT…
Authorities Cited
- Flowers v. State, 567 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)