LUTHER WOODS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LUTHER WOODS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
576 So. 2d 381
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand with directions that costs be stricken. See State v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 306, 310-11 (Fla.1990); and Beasley v. State, 565 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rudolph Acosta, M.D. v. Richter, 671 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1996)…extent necessary to defend against such litigation. Manor Care of Dunedin, Inc. v. Reiser, 611 So. 2d 1305, 1307 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), quoted in Alachua General Hospital, Inc. v. Stewart, 649 So. 2d 357, 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). In West v. Branham, 576 So. 2d 381, 383 (Fla. 4th DCA), review dismissed, 583 So. 2d 1034 (Fla.1991), the Fourth District agreed with the First District that the primary purpose of the statute was to provide a privilege of confidentiality to the physician-patient relationship. Althou…
-
Adelman Steel Corp. & Claims Ctr. v. Winter, 610 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…on cases and will ordinarily be granted when the order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law. Perez v. Eastern Airlines, 569 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So. 2d 1307 (Fla.1991). See also West v. Branham, 576 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 583 So. 2d 1034 (Fla.1991); Franklin v. Nationwide Mutual Life Ins. Co., 566 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 574 So. 2d 142 (Fla. [*497] 1990).1 We deny the petitions for certiorari in cases number 91-2306…1 / 3
-
Phillips v. Lorrie Lytton Ficarra, 618 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…Florida Statutes (1991), which prohibits communications between a doctor and a third party regarding the medical condition of the doctor’s patient unless compelled by a subpoena for deposition, evidentiary hearing, or at trial. See West v. Branham, 576 So. 2d 381 (Fla.4th DCA 1990), rev. dismissed, 583 So. 2d 1034 (1991). However, there is no sanction specified in that section for a violation. (In West we considered a protective order which was entered to prevent a violation from occurring.) Thus, whether to…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1990)
- Beasley v. State, 565 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)