ARTHUR MARCHETTA AND JOSEPH WEISELBERG, APPELLANTS,
v.
ROBERT HOWARD, APPELLEE
ARTHUR MARCHETTA AND JOSEPH WEISELBERG, APPELLANTS,
ROBERT HOWARD, APPELLEE
576 So. 2d 767
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Spence, Payne, Masington & Grossman, P.A. v. Philip M. Gerson, P.A., 483 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 492 So. 2d 1334 (Fla.1986).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Laushway v. Onofrio, 670 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…nce. In this regard, the record evidence of Mr. Laush-way’s exertion of undue influence was classic. This was not a close case. Because there is no basis for this court to disturb the judgment of the trial court, we affirm. See In re Estate of Ryan, 576 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (it is not the function of the appellate court to reweigh the evidence, and as long as there is substantial competent evidence to support a trial court’s finding that a will was procured by undue influence the appellate court must…
Authorities Cited
- Spence, Payne, Masington & Grossman, P.A. v. Philip M. Gerson, P.A., 483 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)