JAMES EDWARDS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1991-03-27
No. 89-3298
BOOTH, ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
576 So. 2d 924 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Steiner v. State, 573 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); King v. State, 557 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 564 So. 2d 1086 (Fla.1990).

BOOTH, ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hawthorne v. State, 583 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …ase, in that Conditions (4) and (5) were clearly not at issue. Further, although the written revocation order purports to state grounds for revocation, it is also meaningless in light of the issues tried at the hearing. [*426] In McClinton v. State, 576 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the trial court failed both to make an oral pronouncement of the grounds for revocation, and to state such grounds in the written revocation order. This court reversed and remanded for entry of an amended written order specifyin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw