ANTHONY SNELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-04-09
No. 90-1095
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
577 So. 2d 696 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Bryant v. State, 386 So. 2d 237 (Fla.1980) (revolver is a “firearm” within meaning of statutes defining firearm); Fischer v. State, 488 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (verdict finding defendant guilty of robbery “as charged” constituted specific finding that defendant was armed during commission of robbery); State v. Nunez, 368 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (word “firearm” within statute defining firearm does not exclude a pistol).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Pollock, 600 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …another person. Id. It is not entirely clear whether the weapon was on the floorboard protruding from the end of the seat, or was in the seat itself, but under either reading on this record the motion should have been denied. See id.; O.H. v. State, 577 So. 2d 696, 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); State v. Puig, 551 So. 2d 552, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), review denied, 563 So. 2d 633 (Fla.1990); State v. Strachan, 549 So. 2d 235, 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Myers v. State, 546 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The order under…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw