DAVID CLARK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID CLARK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
578 So. 2d 50
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case, but strike that portion of the judgment which requires appellant to pay court costs and attorney fees. Appellant was not given notice that such costs would be imposed. The state may seek reimposition of the costs after proper notice.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stuart v. State, 579 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…vehicle in the commission of the felony to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. It is then the Department’s responsibility to revoke the driving license privilege of the convicted. See § 322.26(3), Fla.Stat. (1987); Hughes v. State, 578 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Mandile v. State, 547 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence but vacate that portion of his sentence suspending his driver’s license. We remand to the trial court for furt…
-
Mansfield v. State, 578 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…n of the trial court’s sentence which revokes his driver’s license for a period of ten years. For the reasons explained in Mandile v. State, 547 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), Blair v. State, 554 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), and Hughes v. State, 578 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we vacate that portion of the sentence and remand for further proceedings in compliance with chapter 322, Florida Statutes (1987). FRANK, A.C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.…
-
Hope v. State, 588 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…rovides that the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, not the courts, shall revoke a driver’s license where a motor vehicle is used in the commission of any felony. See Stuart v. State, 579 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hughes v. State, 578 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Mandile v. State, 547 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). However, sections 322.28(2)(a) and (e) provide that the courts, not the Department, shall revoke a driver’s license for the offense of driving a motor vehicle while under the…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence