GLORIA CUETO, APPELLANT,
v.
CARIBCO ENTERPRISES, INC., & EL KUNKO IMPORT & EXPORT, INC. D/B/A TIO PEPE LIQUORS, APPELLEES
GLORIA CUETO, APPELLANT,
CARIBCO ENTERPRISES, INC., & EL KUNKO IMPORT & EXPORT, INC. D/B/A TIO PEPE LIQUORS, APPELLEES
578 So. 2d 396
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff filed her complaint within the four year period permitted by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order finding that this action was not timely brought. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hallegere (Hall) Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp., 644 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1994)…ach is negligence per se, or evidence of negligence, turns on various considerations aimed at resolving what the Legislature intended when it passed the statute in the first place.”), review dismissed, 629 So. 2d 132 (Fla.1993); Finkle v. Mayerchak, 578 So. 2d 396, 397-98 (Fla.3d DCA 1991); Fischer v. Metcalf, 543 So. 2d 785 (Fla.3d DCA 1989) (applying the criteria set forth in Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975), to discern whether the legislature intended to create a cause of actio…
-
Hallegere (Hall) Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp., 618 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…amended third-party complaint, although inartfully drawn, stated a cause of action against the contractor, individually, for common-law negligence, and it was thus error for the trial court to dismiss count II of that complaint. Finkle v. Mayerchak, 578 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA1991). The contractor contends that count II must fail because the owners’ alleged damages amount to purely economic losses, citing AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 515 So. 2d 180 (Fla.1987) (there can be no independent tort f…1 / 2