MICHAEL L. DECENSO, HUSBAND, APPELLANT,
v.
JANET V. LUCAS, F/K/A JANET V. DECENSO, WIFE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed a permanent alimony award based on the husband's military retirement but reversed and remanded because the trial court improperly calculated the award using gross retirement pay instead of disposable retirement pay as required by federal law.
A permanent alimony award based on military retirement must be calculated using disposable retirement pay, not gross retirement pay, as defined under 10 U.S.C. § 1408(a)(4).
[1] Military retirement benefits awarded as permanent alimony must be calculated using disposable retired pay as defined by federal law, not gross retirement pay.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Disposable pay is the total monthly retired pay minus certain approved deductions.”
Defining the proper basis for calculating military retirement alimony awards under 10 U.S.C. § 1408(a)(4).
In a dissolution of marriage, the trial court awarded the wife permanent alimony equal to sixteen percent of the husband's gross military retirement p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Military Retirement Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, the husband, challenges a final judgment of dissolution. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The trial court awarded to the wife, as permanent alimony, an interest in the husband’s military retirement equal to sixteen percent of the husband’s gross retirement pay. Federal law provides that “disposable” retired pay may be considered to be the property of the member of the retirement system and his spouse. Disposable pay is the total monthly retired pay minus certain approved deductions. 10 U.S.C. § 1408(a)(4). While we approve the award of a percentage of the husband’s retirement as permanent alimony, the trial court erred in utilizing the “gross” pay as the basis for the percentage. The wife argues that the improper use of gross pay is not a basis for reversal under 10 U.S.C. § 1408(e)(5). That section states that an order providing for payment of an amount of “disposable” retired pay which exceeds the amount authorized by law shall not be considered irregular solely for that reason, and the order shall be considered fully satisfied by payment of the maximum amount. Because this section takes as its starting point an award of disposable pay, the use of gross pay in this case requires correction. We affirm as to all other issues. Accordingly, we reverse the award of permanent alimony and remand for entry of an award based upon disposable retirement pay.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ„ and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.