BARRY A. GRAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1991-05-03
No. 89-02342
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
578 So. 2d 865 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case, but strike that portion of the judgment which requires appellant to pay court costs and attorney fees. Appellant was not given notice that such costs would be imposed. The state may seek reimposition of the costs after proper notice.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Steadman v. Steadman, 645 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
    …the parties, and of providing needed support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1202 (Fla.1980). To that end, the trial court has broad discretionary authority to achieve an overall equitable resolution of the issues, id. and Nurse v. Nurse, 578 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1991), and we will not disturb the result so long as the total scheme of distribution devised by the trial court is supported by competent substantial evidence. Hamlet v. Hamlet, 583 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1991); Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So. 2d 20…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw