ANTHONY BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1991-05-03
No. 91-9
JOANOS, WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur.
578 So. 2d 893 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Brooks appeals his concurrent sentences of 20 years in state prison as a habitual felony offender. We find the crimes for which the appellant is currently being sentenced occurred prior to the simultaneous convictions used to support his sentences as a habitual felony offender, and, therefore, those convictions cannot be considered prior felony convictions as required by section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). Popolo v. State, 477 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). We, therefore, vacate the appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Palmore v. State, 584 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …), which holds that use of simultaneous convictions does not satisfy the statutory requirement of two or more prior convictions under the habitual offender statute. Furthermore, we find that Palmore’s sentence must be reversed under Brooks v. State, 578 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), as the offenses for which the appellant was sentenced occurred before the date of the convictions upon which the lower court relied as “prior convictions.” See also Snowden v. State, 449 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), quashed o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw