RICHARD M. WHITLOCK, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
BIENVENIDA B. CAMBARE, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The prevailing party in a medical malpractice action is entitled to attorney's fees under section 768.56, Florida Statutes, if the cause of action accrued during the statute's effective period.
A plaintiff appealed a medical malpractice judgment and an award of attorney's fees to the prevailing doctor. The underlying malpractice incident occu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Accrual Of Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
COWART, Judge.
The appellee doctor prevailed in a medical malpractice action in the trial court and was awarded attorney’s fees under section 768.56, Florida Statutes. The plaintiff in the medical malpractice action appealed both decisions. In a Per Curiam Affirmance without opinion, this court has upheld the judgment in favor of the doctor, Whitlock v. Cambare, Case No. 90-167 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 26, 1991). This case involves the legality of the award of attorney’s fees to the doctor. We affirm that award.
Section 768.56, Florida Statutes, which provided for an award of attorney’s fees “to the prevailing party in any civil action which involves a claim for damages by reason of injury, death, or monetary loss on account of alleged malpractice”, was enacted effective July 1, 1980 (Ch. 80-67, Laws of Florida), and was repealed effective October 1, 1985 (Ch. 85-175, § 43, Laws of Florida). The cause of action for medical malpractice accrues for the purposes of applying section 768.56, Florida Statutes, when the malpractice incident causing the injury and giving rise to the liability occurs. Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Scherer, 558 So. 2d 411 (Fla.1990).
In the instant case the incident from which the injuries arose occurred on January 16, 1984. The cause of action accrued during the “window period” in which the statute was effective. Therefore, the prevailing party is entitled to attorney’s fees under the statute. See Young v. Altenhaus, 472 So. 2d 1152 (Fla.1985); Winter Park Memorial Hospital Assoc., Inc. v. Jemison, 514 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Lower Florida Keys Hospital District v. Littlejohn, 520 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 531 So. 2d 1352 (Fla.1988); see also, 2 Hauser, Attorney’s Fees in Florida, Ch. 15-III-A p. 34 (1988).
The order awarding the appellee doctor attorney’s fees is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whitlock v. Stephan E. Drazinic, M.D. & Stephan E. Drazinic, M.D., P.A., 622 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
Authorities Cited
- Jerrold Young v. Fern Altenhaus, 472 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1985)
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Scherer, 558 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1990)
- The Lower Fla. Keys Hosp. Dist. v. Littlejohn, 520 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Winter Park Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. v. Jemison, 514 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)