MARGARITA D. VELLIOS, N/K/A MARGARITA D. ORTA, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL VELLIOS, APPELLEE
MARGARITA D. VELLIOS, N/K/A MARGARITA D. ORTA, APPELLANT,
PAUL VELLIOS, APPELLEE
579 So. 2d 414
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed under authority of Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443, 447-48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Irve Gladstone v. Smith, 729 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…aint through a licensed attorney was eminently reasonable, hardly an abuse of its discretion. To summarize, where no viable cause of action is asserted after repeated opportunities to amend, dismissal is appropriate. See Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp., 579 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Gladstone was given a more than adequate opportunity to frame a viable cause of action, but he failed to do so. His “claims” fail to offer facts sufficient to state a cause of action. See, e.g., Estate of Smith v. City of Hollywo…
-
Abel Flores Gonzalez v. State, 233 So. 3d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…e or one of its agencies); Gladstone v. Smith, 729 So. 2d 1002, 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that “where no viable cause of action is asserted after repeated opportunities to amend, dismissal is appropriate”) (citing Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp., 579 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)).…
Authorities Cited
- Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)