TOMMY WRIGHT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• van Bryant v. State, 602 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …rely on the unconstitutionality of the amendment to void his sentence. See Hale v. State, 589 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); McNeil v. State, 588 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); King v. State, 585 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wright v. State, 579 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender and remand this matter to the trial court for resentencing. On remand, the trial court may again sentence appellant as a habitual offender upon making findings…
• McNEIL v. State, 588 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …nal as violative of the one subject rule. However, because appellant could have been habitualized under the pre-amendment statute as well, we decline to consider this argument. See King v. State, 585 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wright v. State, 579 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). ERVIN and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.…
• Tims v. State, 592 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …offender under the 1988 version of the statute, appellant may not challenge the constitutionality of Chapter 89-280. [*742] See McNeil v. State, 588 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); King v. State, 585 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wright v. State, 579 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we affirm. SHIVERS, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur. . Art. Ill, § 6, Fla.Const. (1968), provides in part: "Every law shall embrace but one subject and matter properly connected therewith, and the subject shall b…

Authorities Cited

• Henderson v. Antonacci, 62 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1952)