IRWIN ZUCKERMAN, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
CITIBANK, N.A., ETC., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-06-11
Nos. 89-2446, 90-13
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
580 So. 2d 886 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester, 400 So. 2d 804, 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So. 2d 818, 819 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So. 2d 395 (Fla.1973); Arrow Beef Corp. v. Dutkin, 183 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Jones v. Royal Palm Ice Co., 145 So. 2d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962), cert. denied, 155 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1963).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Moya v. Bd. of Regents, 629 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
    …the arbitrator’s award, although he had been reassigned to a different work station as a senior accountant. BOR argued that the decision where to assign Moya was within the discretion of UCF and BOR. See State of Florida, Department of HRS v. Muniz, 580 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1991) (a state employee with permanent status has a number of rights but has no vested interest in a particular job, although the employee must be reassigned to a position with the same degree of responsibility and the same salary rang…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw