RAVEN D. DEMBROWSKI, N/K/A RAVEN D. WHITE, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH R. DEMBROWSKI, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Preservation Of Issues For Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and vacate the trial court’s order confirming the general master’s report. Appellee concedes that the trial court entered the order within the ten (10) day period Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(h) allowed for filing exceptions to the general master’s report and that appellant should be permitted to file exceptions consistent with the rule.
Appellant did not raise the issues presented in his remaining points on appeal before the general master and the trial court did not resolve them. As a result, we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. See Hurley v. Slingerland, 461 So. 2d 282, 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct further proceedings consistent with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(h).
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moskowitz v. Moskowitz, 611 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…order. Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Kay v. Kay, 430 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Cox v. Cox, 490 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Elliott v. Elliott, 478 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Dembrowski v. Dembrowski, 580 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We recognize that this issue appears mooted by the trial court’s subsequent denial of appellant’s exceptions. Appellees argue that a trial court may disregard the clear mandate of the above opinions of this court by simply pro…
Authorities Cited
- Raymond S. Hurley and related interests v. Slingerland, 461 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)