PIER HOUSE JOINT VENTURE, A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANT,
v.
ERVIN HIGGS, MONROE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER; HARRY F. KNIGHT, MONROE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR; AND JOHN HERNDON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF REVENUE, APPELLEES
PIER HOUSE JOINT VENTURE, A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANT,
ERVIN HIGGS, MONROE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER; HARRY F. KNIGHT, MONROE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR; AND JOHN HERNDON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF REVENUE, APPELLEES
581 So. 2d 258
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See and compare Pier House Joint Venture v. Higgs, 555 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fretwell v. State, 586 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…" However, at the sentencing hearing the trial court indicated that certain adjustments would be made in the sentencing but that the scoresheet would remain the same. The trial court should revisit the scoresheet after remand. See Ulpierre v. State, 581 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). . The word "clarify,” as opposed to “amend" or to "change", subtly suggests that no change in meaning is being made and that the rule as clarified could be properly applied to cases in existence when the rule was "clarified.” .…
Authorities Cited
- Pier House Joint Venture v. Ervin Higgs, 555 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)