RUDOLPH ZADNICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RUDOLPH ZADNICK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
581 So. 2d 615
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED on the authority of State v. Boatwright, 559 So. 2d 210 (Fla.1990); State v. Enmund, 476 So. 2d 165 (Fla.1985); Martin v. State, 525 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
W. SHARP, COWART and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hidalgo v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 46 Fla. L. Weekly D324 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)…ving as an 8 expert witness has “become more lucrative than the usual day job for many professionals.” Kendall Coffey, Inherent Judicial Authority and the Expert Disqualification Doctrine, 56 Fla. L. Rev. 195, 196 (2004); see Rossi v. Brown, 581 So. 2d 615, 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (“[A] ‘battle of the experts’ has become the norm in modern trials. Courts [or a jury] must resolve the issues upon which the experts differ.”); Neil D. Kodsi, Confronting Experts Whose Opinions Are Neither Supported Nor…
-
Mueller v. Kamenesh, 864 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…ue of interpretation was for resolution by the trial judge as the finder of fact. See City of Miami Beach v. Sussman, 376 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Elmore v. Enterprise Devs., Inc., 418 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); see also Rossi v. Brown, 581 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). We are not empowered to interfere with the [*40] result of that process. Elmore, 418 So. 2d at 1079 (“Given the existence of an ambiguity and of evidence to support the trial court’s interpretation, we are simply not authorized…
-
Nekeisha Wilson v. Fla. Birth-Related Neurological Injury Comp. Ass'n (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)…ry period.” Therefore, the timing element that the presumption would have supplied was already present. injury. While Appellant’s experts did not share these views, the ALJ—as was her duty—resolved this “battle of the experts.” See Rossi v. Brown, 581 So. 2d 615, 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (observing that “a ‘battle of the experts’ has become the norm in modern trials” and that “no matter how difficult or complex” an issue becomes, “[c]ourts must resolve the issues upon which the experts differ”); see also Ole…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Carney, 476 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1985)
- State v. Enmund, 476 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1985)
- State v. Boatwright, 559 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1990)
- Martin v. State, 525 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)