AIRCRAFT SERVICES AND HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, APPELLANTS,
v.
JULIO REYES, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Permanent Impairment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We review a workers’ compensation order wherein the judge of compensation claims awarded the claimant temporary partial disability benefits and wage loss benefits. The employer and carrier first contend that the award of wage loss benefits was error because the record contains no competent, substantial evidence that a permanent impairment resulted from the implant of a lens in the claimant’s eye. This argument is patently frivolous. The employer and carrier next contend that the judge of compensation claims made a clerical error with regard to the dates for which temporary partial disability benefits were awarded. We decline to address this issue because the employer and carrier failed to bring this error to the attention of the judge by motion for rehearing. Acosta Roofing Company v. Gillyard, 402 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morris v. Dollar Tree Store & Specialty Risk Servs., 869 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…ment, the error is substantive, rather than inconsequential; thus not susceptible to correction by rehearing. See Fla. R. Work. Comp. P. 4.141; Bogdanova v. Royal Hanneford Circus, 848 So. 2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Aircraft Servs. v. Reyes, 582 So. 2d 66, 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). . See McArthur Farms v. Peterson, 586 So. 2d 1273, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).…
-
Commercial Carrier Corp. & Comcar Indus., Inc. v. LaPOINTE, 723 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…ment Security v. American Building Maintenance, 449 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We cannot say that awarding future medical benefits where none were properly claimed and noticed is of no consequence. Id. at 779. Compare Aircraft Servs. v. Reyes, 582 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Albertson’s Inc. v. Natale, 555 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard, 402 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). . It appears from the record that Comear may have voluntarily paid wage-loss benefits up until…
-
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, 742 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…rrect within the time available for correction. (Citations omitted); see also Acosta Roofing Co. v. Gillyard, 402 So. 2d 1321, 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Albertson’s, Inc. v. Natale, 555 So. 2d 946, 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Aircraft Servs. v. Reyes, 582 So. 2d 66, 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, we decline to disturb this award. AFFIRMED. ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Acosta Roofing Co. & Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Gussie Gillyard, 402 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)