ROBERT T. AVERA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Robert Avera, an inmate, challenged the Department of Corrections' revocation of 293 days of gain time following his 1981 escape. The court reversed the summary denial of his habeas corpus petition, holding that under Florida law, only gain time earned prior to an escape can be forfeited, and remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the DOC improperly revoked gain time earned after the escape.
The court held that Avera stated a valid cause of action for habeas corpus because he alleged facts that, if true, would establish that the DOC violated its own rules by forfeiting gain time earned after the escape rather than only gain time earned before the escape.
[1] A petition for a writ of habeas corpus should not be summarily denied if it alleges facts which, if true, would establish that the Department of Corrections failed to com…
[2] Florida Administrative Code Rule 33-11.011 mandates that only gain time earned prior to an escape may be forfeited by the Department of Corrections without prior notice o…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“an inmate who is convicted of escape while in the custody of the department ... shall have all gain time earned prior to the escape ... forfeited by the department without prior notice or a hearing.”
Establishes that DOC rules permit forfeiture only of gain time earned prior to escape, not after
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAvera was convicted in 1979 and sentenced to 30 years in prison. He escaped in 1981 and was convicted and sentenced for the escape in 1984. In August …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Interpretation Of Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
SHIVERS, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a summary denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We reverse.
Avera is an inmate in Starke. He was convicted in 1979 and sentenced to 30 years in prison. He escaped in 1981 and was convicted and sentenced for the escape in 1984. In August 1990 Avera filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging the Department of Corrections (DOC) improperly revoked 293 days of gain time earned after the 1981 escape. He states that according to DOC rules, only gain time earned before an escape can be forfeited, and he had no gain time prior to the escape. Avera also alleges that if his gain time was properly calculated he would immediately be eligible for release from prison. Avera appears to have exhausted his administrative remedies because he attached to his petition an administrative appeal to — and response from — the Secretary of the DOC. The DOC’s response was that Florida Statute 944.28(1) states Tf a prisoner is convicted of escape ... the Department may, without notice or hearing, declare a forfeiture of all gaintime earned ... prior to such escape_’ The rules of the Department of Corrections, Chapter 33-11.11 state that the gaintime earned prior to escape or parole will be forfeited under those conditions.
The response of the DOC goes on to say that Avera therefore forfeited all gain time earned up to the 1981 escape.
The circuit court summarily denied Av-era’s petition as failing to state a cause of action on its face.
The agency and the circuit court do not address Avera’s allegation that he forfeited gain time earned between the escape and the conviction therefor. Florida Administrative Code Rule 33-11.011 states “an inmate who is convicted of escape while in the custody of the department ... shall have all gain time earned prior to the escape ... forfeited by the department without prior notice or a hearing.” (emphasis added). Avera has alleged he lost gain time earned after the escape as a result of the escape. He has therefore alleged facts which, if true, would establish that the DOC failed to comply with its own rules; and the petition should not have been summarily denied. Taylor v. Barton, 556 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Avera forfeited gain time earned after the escape as a result of the escape.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions for further proceedings.
ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Avera v. Barton, 632 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…g Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So. 2d 687 (Fla.1990). The trial court summarily denied the petition. On appeal, this court interpreted Avera’s petition as alleging that DOC improperly revoked gain time earned after the date of his escape. Avera v. State, 582 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). On July 26, 1991, the court reversed the denial of the writ, finding that Avera alleged facts that, if true, would establish that DOC failed to comply with its own rules. Id. The court then remanded for an evidentiary hearing to…
Authorities Cited
- Taylor v. Barton, 556 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)