DAVID CHAMBERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-07-16
No. 91-433
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
582 So. 2d 170 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)

Opinion of the Court

Appellant, David Chambers, appeals an order placing appellant on probation and requiring the payment of restitution as a condition of probation.

Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that portions of the probation order must be stricken because they impermissi-bly delegate the manner of payment of the restitution to be determined by the probation officer. See Milloway v. State, 567 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williams v. State, 556 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand appellant’s sentence with directions that those portions of the probation order which delegate the manner of payment of restitution be stricken.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw