JAMES LEROY STURGEON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1991-07-10
No. 90-01893
SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
582 So. 2d 746 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a probation condition restricting contact with persons under twenty-one was an overbroad restriction on contact with adults. The condition was amended to prohibit contact with persons under eighteen.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant's probation was revoked for violating conditions, including having no contact with minors without permission. The trial court imposed a cond…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*747] PER CURIAM.

The appellant was placed on probation for committing a lewd assault on a child under age sixteen. The trial court revoked his probation, finding that he violated two conditions of probation, one of which required that he have no contact with children under age sixteen without written permission of his probation officer. The appellant was sentenced to a term in prison followed by additional probation with revised conditions.

We agree with the appellant’s contention that the court erred in restricting his contact during the probationary period with persons under age twenty-one without written permission. Such a condition unduly restricts the appellant’s contacts with adults.

Therefore, we amend that condition of probation to prohibit contact with persons under eighteen years of age. Further, to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that condition is amended to provide that written permission must come from the probation officer, rather than the court. In all other aspects, we affirm.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Baxter v. State, 596 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …the other hand, the third condition was substantially different from those imposed in his original probation. That condition states, “No contact with any children under the age of 21, without permission from the Judge.” Following Sturgeon v. State, 582 So. 2d 746, 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we direct the trial court on remand to modify the third condition to prohibit contact with persons under the age of eighteen. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., co…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw