DAVID L. HEILMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
BARBARA ANN HEILMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1991-08-14
No. 91-1508
ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
583 So. 2d 442 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with our opinion in Oliveri v. Oliveri, 541 So. 2d 174 (Fla.4th DCA 1989), we affirm the order of the trial court. However, we certify the following question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court:

IS THE CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES REQUIRED BEFORE A CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ISSUE MAY BE REFERRED TO A HEARING OFFICER UNDER RULE 1.491, FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE?

ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Heilman v. Heilman, 596 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 1992)
    …OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Heilman v. Heilman, 583 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance: IS THE CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES REQUIRED BEFORE A CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ISSUE MAY BE REFERRED TO A HEARING OFFICER UNDER RULE…
  • W.D. v. State, 603 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …. 2d 1020, 1022 (Fla.1979); Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978); Rich [*657] ardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971); R.W. v. State, 591 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); D.R. v. State, 588 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); M.H. v. State, 583 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); In re F.R., 539 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The final adjudications of delinquency under review are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial. Reversed and remanded.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw