TIMOTHY TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TIMOTHY TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
583 So. 2d 823
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The circuit court order summarily denying defendant’s 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief failed to include the record attachments which conclusively show that defendant is entitled to no relief. (While some records are referred to in the order, they are not attached as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.) We therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record showing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Gentry v. State, 464 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
LETTS, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
A.A. v. Cornell Rolle, 604 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1992)…view six consolidated cases involving juveniles who were adjudicated guilty of contempt of court and sentenced to varying periods of incarceration in secure detention facilities. A.A. v. Rolle, 580 So. 2d 282, 285 (Fla.3d DCA 1991); L.L. v. Woolsey, 583 So. 2d 823, 823 (Fla.lst DCA 1991); A.M.R. v. State, 583 So. 2d 823, 824 (Fla.lst DCA 1991); T.T. v. State, 583 So. 2d 736, 736 (Fla.1st DCA 1991); In re T.S., 585 So. 2d 498, 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); In re L.S., 589 So. 2d 467, 467 (Fla.lst DCA 1991). In A.A.…1 / 2
-
Young v. State, 598 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…everse the trial court’s order, summarily denying post-conviction relief, and remand because the trial court did not attach to the order those portions of the record upon which it relied, even though it referred to them as attached. Taylor v. State, 583 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentry v. State, 464 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.…
-
In the Interest of T.S., 585 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…ect criminal contempt. He contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to secure detention for the offense of contempt for violation of a dependency order. A number of recent decisions reject appellant’s argument. In the Interest of A.M.R., 583 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); L.L. v. Woolsey, 583 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); In the Interest of T.T., 583 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); A.A. v. Rolle, 580 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); In Interest of R.A., 575 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We affi…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fla. Atl. Assocs. v. Belmont, 464 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)