BOB YOUNG, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Bastos, 985 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …Grand Jury, 8 Mass.App.Ct. 760, 397 N.E. 2d 686, 690-91 (1979). Writing more recently, the Fourth District Court of Appeal said, “Courts of other states seem uniformly to hold that the Act permits issuance of subpoenas duces tecum.” Delit v. State, 583 So. 2d 1083, 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We agree. See Jay M. Zitter, supra § 1. We align ourselves with the prevailing rule and answer the first certified question “yes.” The Uniform Law authorizes a request for testimony accompanied by a request for production…
• CMI, Inc. v. Landrum, 64 So. 3d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …ealth, 995 S.W. 2d 377, 382 (Ky.1999), and it has been interpreted in Florida to include requests for testimony accompanied by a request for production of documents, see State v. Bastos, 985 So. 2d 37, 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); see also Delit v. State, 583 So. 2d 1083, 1085-86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). In the instant case, Landrum sought only the production of documents. The subpoena deuces tecum did not seek testimony from any witnesses, out of state or otherwise. The request was directed to CMI’s registered agent i…
• Rushton Skakel, Sr. v. State, 738 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …a detailed affidavit from an inspector of the judicial district. Skakel presented no testimony on the issue of the materiality and necessity of his testimony before the Connecticut grand jury. He relies upon this court’s decision in Delit v. State, 583 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), for the proposition that the certificate and affidavits are not sufficient because they are based entirely on hearsay. Skakel’s reliance on Delit is not well founded. The Delit court did not hold that the foreign state authoriti…

Authorities Cited

• Balter v. PAN Am. Bank OF Hialeah, 383 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)