KENNETH DARA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM DARA, DECEASED, AND ROSALYN DARA, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., AND SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., THE REV. TOMMY WATSON, AND GENE W. MCLEAN, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD G. PIERCE, DECEASED, APPELLEES
KENNETH DARA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM DARA, DECEASED, AND ROSALYN DARA, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., AND SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., THE REV. TOMMY WATSON, AND GENE W. MCLEAN, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD G. PIERCE, DECEASED, APPELLEES
584 So. 2d 25
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hawk v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., 547 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. dismissed, 549 So. 2d 1014 (Fla.1989); O’Brien v. Ortiz, 467 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 479 So. 2d 119 (Fla.1985); Carvajal v. Adams, 405 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 464 (Fla.1982); Bishop v. Watson, 367 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Regan Ins. Agency v. Krause & Sons, Inc., 325 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); §§ 90.401, 90.402, Fla.Stat. (1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. James, 681 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…Road 4-A. In addition, DOT and its counsel were familiar with the property; DOT had been involved in litigation of titles involving the 1937 tax deed to other Old State Road 4-A properties near the property at issue. Ward v. State, Dep’t of Transp., 584 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Moretti v. State, Dep’t of Transp., 592 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Thus, DOT could have discerned from that information that the tax deed conveyed the property in 1937. That property conveyance rendered DOT’s assertions of ow…
-
Moretti v. State of Fla. Dep't OF Transp., 592 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…nding that there is no material distinction, either in fact or in law, between the circumstances surrounding the property involved in this case, and the property that was the subject of this Court’s opinion in Ward v. State of Fla. Dep’t of Transp., 584 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to enter a judgment in favor of the appellants herein. Reversed and remanded with directions.…
Authorities Cited
- Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
- Hawk v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., Inc., 547 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- Bishop v. Watson, 367 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Regan Ins. Agency v. Krause & Sons, Inc., 325 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Carvajal v. Adams, 405 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- McKENZIE v. State, 467 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- O'Brien v. Ortiz, 467 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)