JAMES E. MAJOR, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD L. DUGGER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1991-07-31
No. 90-3298
WIGGINTON, ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
584 So. 2d 109 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is appealing the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus in which he requested all provisional release credits to which he was entitled. Appellant contends that the ex post facto clause precludes the state from denying him the provisional release credits provided for in section 944.-277, Florida Statutes (1988). The appellant’s contention is without merit. See Dugger v. Rodrick, 584 So. 2d 2 (Fla.1991).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Woolworth's Rest. v. Cubillos, 608 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …must be reversed and remanded for further consideration in light of the following. Penalties should not be imposed where the e/c timely file a notice to controvert. § 440.20(6) and (7), Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1990); Glades General Hospital v. Sullenger, 584 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Although the record in the instant case does not contain a notice to controvert, a portion of the JCC’s order states that “[t]his claim was totally controverted.” Because no explanation is offered, we must reverse the award of p…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw