RICHARD MICHAEL NOTARIANNI, APPELLANT,
v.
JEANNETTE F. NOTARIANNI, APPELLEE
RICHARD MICHAEL NOTARIANNI, APPELLANT,
JEANNETTE F. NOTARIANNI, APPELLEE
584 So. 2d 234
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for clarification, we hereby grant appellee’s motion, and substitute the attached opinion for the one previously issued.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur. PER CURIAM.
We reverse the final judgment of dissolution of marriage to the extent it ordered the partition. Partition was not pleaded, stipulated to, or tried by consent. See Ellis v. Ellis, 542 So. 2d 450, 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Labarre v. Labarre, 382 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). On remand, the issue of attorney’s fees should be considered in light of Smith v. Smith, 495 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fredrick M. Lawrence v. State, 590 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…within permitted range); Green v. State, 569 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (court must consider recommended range before sentencing to permitted range; miscalculation requires remand even if sentence within permitted range). But see Arias v. State, 584 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (even without guideline points in question, defendant’s sentence was still within the permitted range so it should be affirmed). Where a scoresheet error changes the recommended range, the sentence imposed, although within the pe…
-
Ivis Suros v. State, 688 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Gentile v. State, 673 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Arias v. State, 584 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. Smith, 495 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
- Labarre v. Labarre, 382 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
- Ellis v. Ellis, 542 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)