JAMES RICKETSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1991-09-05

No. 90-2464

COBB, W. SHARP and DIAMÁNTIS, JJ., concur.

584 So. 2d 240 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1991) Caution

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED on the authority of Florida v. Jimeno, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991).

COBB, W. SHARP and DIAMÁNTIS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Spriggs v. State, 615 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)

…ich affirmed without opinion and cited Jefferson v. State, 571 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). See Chalk v. State, 600 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (Anstead, J., concurring); Thompson v. State, 598 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Passard v. State, 584 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); cf. Fambro v. State, 581 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (defendant knowingly agreed to possibility of HFO sentence as condition of plea arrangement and could not therefore withdraw guilty plea after being so sentenced), rev. den…
Cleveland Clinic Fla. v. Wilson, 685 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)

…nstead, this court shall apply a harmless error test to consider the prejudicial effect of golden rule type arguments. Other courts have applied the harmless error doctrine in considering golden rule arguments. For instance, in Dillard v. Choronzy, 584 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. dismissed, 587 So. 2d 1328 (Fla.1991), the court said: We also do not agree that counsel’s remarks (taken in context) constituted a violation of the “Golden Rule” prohibition. Even if they did, they wei’e not so egregious as to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw