PAUL DOTSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Heuss v. State, 687 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1996)
  …ustice. We have for review Heuss v. State, 660 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinions in Johnson v. State, 595 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 601 So. 2d 553 (Fla.1992), Perkins v. State, 585 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and Taylor v. State, 557 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. ISSUE The question in this case is whether or not an appellate court may engage sua sponte in a harmless error analy…
• Bowen v. State, 677 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
  …ry was inadequate. Jones v. State, 584 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Hayes v. State, 566 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). See Crystal v. State, 616 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Taylor v. State, 605 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Perkins v. State, 585 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See also State v. Young, 626 So .2d 655 (Fla.1993). The Appellant Did Not Attempt To Represent Himself The discussion above concerning the adequacy of the trial court’s Faretta inquiry is based upon the assumption that the app…
• Harris v. State, 619 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …et Ciccarel-li as precluding this court from conducting a harmless error analysis if the point is not raised by the state. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 595 So. 2d 132, 136 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), rev. denied, 601 So. 2d 553 (Fla.1992); Perkins v. State, 585 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA1991); Taylor v. State, 557 So. 2d 138, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA1990). But see Shaw v. State, 557 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1st DCA1990), rev. denied, 569 So. 2d 1280 (Fla.1990). If harmless error existed in this case, I would request this court to go e…

Authorities Cited

• Canales v. State, 571 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)